[jmb99]

Hardware cost & weight, fine. Glass doesn't need to be thicker than it currently is (I can press on my 13 Pro's screen about twice as hard as was needed for 3D Touch's max depth, and no issues with the screen), and the last time I replaced a battery on a 12, the screen was just as thick as the XS.

>Turns out nobody was really using it because discoverability sucked..

Sure, but then redesign the UI after removing 3D Touch to not be equally undiscoverable but less precise. Even on the latest iOS beta with its full redesign, there's still many, many actions that require a long press that are completely undiscoverable. (For example, if you don't have the Shazam app installed, go find the list of songs Siri has recognized when asked "What's this song?" Don't look up the answer.)

[echoangle]

> Glass doesn't need to be thicker than it currently is (I can press on my 13 Pro's screen about twice as hard as was needed for 3D Touch's max depth, and no issues with the screen)

I dont think this is a great argument. The glass maybe needs to be thicker so the sensors on the border can properly measure the pressure, not because the screen is close to shattering.

[sejje]

Maybe you had a hard time parsing his comment.

He is capable of pressing twice as hard as the feature required at maximum. The screen handles 2x the maximum without issues. Therefore, the glass is thick enough to handle half that pressure,as required by the feature.

It's a good argument.

[echoangle]

As far as I know, the pressure is measured around the edge of the screen. If the screen is thin enough, it could bend when pressed and the pressure applied to the center of the screen can’t be properly measured. I don’t think the problem with a too thin screen is the screen breaking when pressing it.

[simondotau]

For what it’s worth, I made the same parsing error upon first read.

[mitthrowaway2]

stiffness != strength