[lastcat743]

Your cautious self awareness is a credit to you.

The “righteous rule” forbids “destroying the innocent”, the only real human right anyone has before Power. Those who do not accept this rule rape entire families from the gene pool to destroy all that they love in this world.

…and smart modern peoples as yourself would flag and remove any such saying so for its impoliteness, not to mention “lack of proof” as though the idea itself incomprehensible.

[kindkang2024]

> The “righteous rule” forbids “destroying the innocent”, the only real human right anyone has before Power.

I will go a little further. There is no righteous or wrong rule before Power.

Power has no concept of morality, just like gravity—it doesn’t care whether you are man or woman, good or evil, right or wrong. It simply manifests the will of whatever/whoever holds it. Darwin’s “survival of the fittest” illustrates this truth: only the fittest survive in life-and-death conflicts. It’s an inherent law, a force that nature enforces. We must adapt to it. Many, however, reject this because they cannot accept such a cold, harsh reality.

Yet, as humans—creatures born of love by the act of 'making love'—we do have a sense of right and wrong. Personally, I cannot accept that “forbidding destroying the innocent” is the 'only' real human right. I will fight against such a will and seek power to oppose it, if it is indeed empowered to manifest in reality. (Remember, the one who holds this will still needs power to manifest it.)

Let this be a reminder to all: "survival of the fittest." This is the clearest possible reminder of our duty. We must actively empower and protect whatever we care about. Whether it is kindness in the face of cruelty, love against destruction—these values will only survive and thrive if we ensure they are fit enough to endure in an indifferent universe.

[lastcat743]

> these values will only survive and thrive if we ensure they are fit enough to endure in an indifferent universe

Reading your meaning further I would like to point out as an outsider of your views, you deceive yourself as to the supremacy wills.

I would like to suggest “will” as “the determination of resolve” and free without influenced by force of fraud. Your scheme doesn’t take into account the fraudster. The scoundrel, the confidence schemers or down right extortionists and so on. They too survive by indomitable wills. They love themselves greatly. Im really only freaked out about the extortionists, of whom you never hear about.

You sound the imaginary of bold strong capable persons just “out going” everyone else. And love, the truest love is your personal power through it all.

While I have seen that work for the lives of passionate persons and I do believe in the will to power and all that.

I have found in no single circumstance is one capacity all ways superior.

In absolutely no existential parity between how lovingly willful you feel for it and the influence of your odds (only opportunity.)

Every line is scraping it to survive and every one has a line of continuity stretching back to the first semblance of our kind. It is trivial to get the winners and losers of the conventional games of life to be transposed with a value sum game for individual worth or survival.

There is insight in what you say though I think you presume too much regarding the advantage evil has over us all.

Extortion is real and silently prevalent among us, however poetic your world view, love will not save us from that. Love is a rolodex for further extortion to some.

Enjoy the beauty of your free will and human rights while they are available to you!

[lastcat743]

> Power has no concept of morality

I will go one further smarty, Power is savage and the “terrible burden of free will” is to mitigate savage Power with a civilizing accord.

“There shall be an uncorruptible righteous rule of law among Powers over Man.”

Next you will ask me, “How does Man maintain an ‘uncorruptible’ righteous[1] rule of law”?

1: principled upon Truth and serving to protect ‘the unculpable’ from breach by will or neglect; one entitled by domain, competent and uncorrupted [hard line on purgery].