[naruhodo]

As an Australian, do you remember:

* The Labor government's failed 2010 internet filter policy, [1] "Those who claim the government's approach is akin to the sort of political censorship practiced by authoritarian regimes are simply misleading the Australian public."

* The Liberal government's passed 2015 mandatory metadata retention laws, [2] "Critics say Australia’s data retention scheme is mass surveillance, and metadata is used to track where people go."

because it doesn't seem like you do. I could also point to the UK's full-take surveillance apparatus, or the US, from around about the same time-frame.

This is a long term project.

[1] https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/internet-filter-is-not-c...

[2] https://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-08-17/metadata-retention-pr...

[l0ng1nu5]

It boggles my mind that they gave police a legal avenue to take over accounts and modify data a few years later:

The Surveillance Legislation Amendment (Identify and Disrupt) Act 2021 (SLAID Act) introduced new powers for Australian law enforcement to combat serious cyber-enabled crime. These powers include data disruption warrants, network activity warrants, and account takeover warrants.

https://theconversation.com/facebook-or-twitter-posts-can-no...