The argument is there should be no balance, I am absolutely allowed to use worst-case. There is a reason it is illegal to price gouge water in emergency situations.
No, there is a balance, you've made up an argument
> I am absolutely allowed to use worst-case.
And I'm allowed to call out this faulty rhetoric
> That law, like many, is written in blood
That law, like many, is causing blood. It was the same thing with masks - instead of incentivizing people to drive far away to get masks from places of low demand and move them back to the city with high deficit, the FBI cracked down on gouging grounds, leaving people in cities exposed to the deadly virus without a mask.
> No, there is a balance, you've made up an argument
Don't fucking gaslight me like I'm illiterate and can't look up three damn messages. You literally said that there should be no controls, ergo no balance between free market capitalism and controlled emergency economy.
Talking with people like you is such a waste of time.
No, there is a balance, you've made up an argument
> I am absolutely allowed to use worst-case.
And I'm allowed to call out this faulty rhetoric
> That law, like many, is written in blood
That law, like many, is causing blood. It was the same thing with masks - instead of incentivizing people to drive far away to get masks from places of low demand and move them back to the city with high deficit, the FBI cracked down on gouging grounds, leaving people in cities exposed to the deadly virus without a mask.