Indeed. But the premise of the objection, was that it is understandable, and a shame that we're not putting such understanding before implementing these systems.
If you're right, and it's essentially impossible to understand (and we still want to advance these technologies) we will have to do so in some degree of ignorance anyway.
If you're right, and it's essentially impossible to understand (and we still want to advance these technologies) we will have to do so in some degree of ignorance anyway.