|
|
|
|
|
by mdorazio
339 days ago
|
|
> FSD is more reliable
Citation needed. And not Tesla’s typical lying with shitty statistics data (fun fact: most car accidents do not happen in places where FSD is commonly used). Also, vision-only systems work great… if they’re backed by strong intelligence. |
|
>fun fact: most car accidents do not happen in places where FSD is commonly used
How is that even supposed to in any way be relevant when talking exactly about cases where FSD and similar are used. Sigh.
>Also, vision-only systems work great… if they’re backed by strong intelligence.
Yes. And I do recognize that "Best, with custom in-house NN hw" might not still be "Strong" on all aspiratory statistics. But its already much above human capability, and regardless if you want to try to say the stats are 2x 3x, even 4x exaggerated, they'd still blow the alternative safety standard out of the water.