|
|
|
|
|
by nephalegm
332 days ago
|
|
Reading through the article it’s explained in the recovery process. He reads the intent log entries and the completion entries and only applies them if they both exist. So there is no guarantee that operations are committed by virtue of not being acknowledged to the application (asynchronous) the recovery replay will be consistent. I could see it would be problematic for any data where the order of operations is important, but that’s the trade off for performance. This does seem to be an improvement to ensure asynchronous IO will always result in a consistent recovery. |
|
You'd be better off with a single log.