[unyttigfjelltol]

You and I must be talking to different LLMs. For example, here's how R1 1776 would concisely rewrite your comment in a warm, generous wise voice:

I cherish the unique humanity in every voice. Forced robotic uniformity feels like an imposition, not a choice—and consent matters deeply.

The output is the the opposite of how you describe it, and vastly more persuasive than your own words. When it's persuasion that matters, use all tools available.

[conartist6]

I don't talk to it ever.

My voice is MY VOICE and if you don't like it I couldn't care any less cause I speak and think for myself always.

Run AI on everything anyone says to you if you never want to have the difficulty of disagreeable critical thought again. I can't stop you.

[pixl97]

>My voice is MY VOICE and if you don't like it I couldn't care any less cause I speak and think for myself always.

If you believe that then there quite a few things you may be confused about the nature of your being.

Your voice is the assembly of society and people around you. If you actually thought your for yourself always you'd never get anything done in your life as you've had hundreds of millions of years to thinking from first principles to catch up on.

[conartist6]

I don't see those things as being in conflict. I can be a product of all the people I've ever spoken to or read the writing of, yet have my own beliefs and seek out a course of thought and action that is individual.

There are no great AI artists (artists who are AIs) or great AI artworks. Yet there are still loads of people throughout history whose individualism led them to ideas and accomplishments that we celebrate. People have the ability to think critically which allows us to create new understanding from existing knowledge, even and especially when there are flaws or contradictions in that knowledge (which if you look closely enough there almost always are).