[antithesizer]

You could prove it yourself if you actually care whether or not it's true and aren't just positioning yourself in an imaginary debate so you can claim "burden of proof". If what they're saying is true then it will still be true whether any proof is posted by them here or not.

[mountainriver]

No actually the proof is in basically every benchmark, which are all super well known, so the burden of proof is on the OP

[ath3nd]

It's funny how that works in your mind.

There comes a snake oil salesmen and says that LLMs are the bees'knees and you just take as a given without any critical thought.

But when people actually have proof that LLMs are nothing special and even reduce productivity (by 19% in experienced developers): https://secondthoughts.ai/p/ai-coding-slowdown you are screaming to the heavens for proof.

I am the last to stop the AI fanbase from outsourcing their critical thinking and some of their wallet to a fancy autocomplete, that means more work for the rest of us that actually do the thinking.

LLM vibe-"engineers" will be fleeced $$$ when Anthropic actually starts wanting to be profitable: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44598254#44602695

Their skills deteriorate, and so does their critical thinking: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/15/1/6

And I just can't stop giggling imagining their workday when Claude is down.

LGTM is not a sustainable career choice, people.