|
|
|
|
|
by shiandow
337 days ago
|
|
I read through P1, and it seemed to be correct. Though you could explain the central idea of the proof into about 3 sentences and a few drawings. It reads like someone who found the correct answer but seemingly had no understanding of what they did and just handed in the draft paper. Which seems odd, shouldn't an LLM be better at prose? |
|