Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by criley2 338 days ago
It can still be faster to develop with AI watching it work. It can legitimately introduce an entire simple fullstack change across multiple projects in my monorepo including graphql queries/mutations, typeorm repository, a service layer, and a reactnative frontend using apollo client, etc. It can do that in about 10 minutes in my local. I can't. If I turned it into a speed run event and practiced, maybe I could get it done in 10 minutes but honestly, it's a machine and I'm John Henry. Since it's using my IDE, it's using my meticulously setup and maintained local and I'm able to quickly stop it and fix any mistake it makes. Level 2 driving assist.

I have enjoyed the github copilot agent style development where someone elses computer is running everything, and I can make a request and just come back half an hour later and check on it. But this level 5 driver gets the wrong destination basically every time, and then it's another 10, 20 or even 30 minutes for it to make a minor adjustment. It doesnt understand my `yarn` scripts, it runs my tests wrong, it can't do codegen, it doesn't format or lint files, etc. I asked copilot yesterday to lint and format a PR and it took 25 minutes of agentic work lol.
2 comments
wrs 338 days ago
For me, one of the new superpowers is the ability to interactively do multiple drafts following different design principles and see which works better.

I just started an embedded project where two different people had implemented subsystems independently, and I asked Claude to merge the code into a single project and convert the existing synchronous code into asynchronous state machines called from a single main loop. It wrote three drafts with me giving it different stylistic principles to follow. I don't know if I would have had the patience to do that myself!

link
twelve40 337 days ago
> I'm able to quickly stop it and fix any mistake it makes

I would think that's the process too, but according to the article the dude is almost completely hands off:

> You come back to ten thousand lines of code. You spend 5 minutes reading. One sentence of feedback. Another ten thousand lines appear while you're making lunch.

You can't humanly review 10 thousand lines of code in 5 minutes. This is either complete bullshit or it really writes flawless code for them and never makes any mistakes.

link