1) 'AI Overview "No, it's not strictly true that Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) is exclusively made for large teams, but it does offer significant advantages in such environments."'
2) 'Casey Muratori -- The Big OOPs: Anatomy of a Thirty-five'
Object-oriented programming is popular in big companies, because
it suits the way they write software. At big companies, software
tends to be written by large (and frequently changing) teams of
mediocre programmers. Object-oriented programming imposes a
discipline on these programmers that prevents any one of them from
doing too much damage.
He spends the first half of his presentation debunking the meme that OO was created for working with teams, not that it happens to be good for working with teams. Your quoted bit is not evidence of someone making the first claim, only the second.
This is not moving the goal posts. Different people making the same claim may use different phrasing, and Google very much has recency bias. By searching for something slightly different we deprioritize the video we’ve already seen.
Muratori's statement (that he debunks in his talk): OO was created for teams.
Graham's statement: OO is useful for teams.
Those are distinct concepts, there's lots of evidence of statements like Graham's out there, and you've helpfully provided one. What igouy is asking for is evidence of the former claim.
2) 'Casey Muratori -- The Big OOPs: Anatomy of a Thirty-five'
Still no reliable reference.