[davedx]

Are all these Claude Code articles adverts for people building wrappers around Claude Code? I'm starting to get quite sceptical about how good it actually is

[khalic]

Claude code is very good, no idea about the wrapper and don’t really care. The “hidden” adverts do get on my nerves though

[machiaweliczny]

I disagree. It's pricy and does crap code unless precisely instructed. Maybe because I was prompting in non-english langauge

[mike_hearn]

Don't do that. Quality of all models tanks in non-English unfortunately. It's fine for chat and translation tasks but their cognitive capacities does reduce a lot.

One of the next features I'm expecting wrappers to add on top is auto-translation. In many work contexts it makes more sense to translate what the user said to English, process that and translate the answer back than ask the model to speak the language natively.

[khalic]

If I may, LLMs have no cognitive capacities. Their corpora in English are simply bigger.

[khalic]

Oh I wouldn’t try anything other than English with Claude. For the quality, it depends on many things, the context given, the quality of the code given as context, style, etc.

I easily double my output with very little effect on quality. It does require constant supervision though, I don’t see AI producing professional quality code by any other mean than human supervision, for a looooong time.