|
|
|
|
|
by anon84873628
337 days ago
|
|
Please, you didn't just ask genuine innocent questions. You assumed many things about the OP's mindset then passed judgment on it. You refer several times to argument and debate but you're tilting at windmills. The OP didn't make an argument. The closest thing is "Such is the state of medicine for profit, I guess." which is more of a resigned, bitter observation than overt indictment of capitalism. If you want to use that as a prompt to say why no other funding model is better, then ok fine. But there are polite ways to do it which acknowledge the legitimacy of the person's feelings. What's different about my comments is that they address things actually in the text and are in the spirit of bystander intervention and setting the tone of the commons. |
|
I’ll pose an argument to the rationalist crowd that I feel likes to think and feed deeply off these types of discussions:
say I’m destined to create the cure for cancer or bring about the singularity or whatever. I’m not, but let’s say I was. And I fall and hit my head one day and die because some billionaire decided that my condition wasn’t worth investing a miniscule fractional percentage of his wealth.
would that be wasteful?