[jsnk]

""" Not because AI can't do the work. It can.

But because the economics don't translate the way VCs claim. When you replace a $50,000 employee with AI, you don't capture $50,000 in software revenue. You capture $5,000 if you're lucky. """

So you are saying, AI does replace labour.

[graphememes]

Realistically, AI makes the easiest part of the job easier, not all the other parts.

[deepfriedbits]

For now

[DanHulton]

Citation needed.

[bgroins]

History

[th0ma5]

Good thing we solved lipid disorders with Olean, Betamax gave us all superior home video, and you can monetize your HN comments with NFTs or else I wouldn't have any money to post!

[pjmlp]

Experience in industrial revolution, and factory automation.

[eikenberry]

So you mean in a hundred years it so? I don't think that is a good counter.

[pjmlp]

If you think the time is what matters from the history lesson, good luck.

[warthog]

Maybe I should change the title indeed. Intention was to point to the fact that from the perspective of a startup, even if you replace it fully, you are not capturing 100x the previous market.