I believe there's a good argument to be made, yes. This video [0] by a philosophy teacher convinced me of it. Unfortunately, it's in french so most here probably won't be able to enjoy it.
These come up every now and then, but are explicitly arguing against factory farming, not meat consumption in general. Factory farming is indeed immoral, but is a separate, but related issue to meat consumption.
philosophical viewpoint arguing that human beings are the central or most significant entities in the world. This is a basic belief embedded in many Western religions and philosophies. Anthropocentrism regards humans as separate from and superior to nature and holds that human life has intrinsic value while other entities (including animals, plants, mineral resources, and so on) are resources that may justifiably be exploited for the benefit of humankind.
It's hard to argue that we're not in some way unique when we're the only animals having this debate, and every other carnivore or omnivore (and many 'herbivores,' opportunistically) have no such qualms and happily eat all the other animals they possibly can.
[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaVWbdlAiCQ
EDIT: he gives these sources that, fortunetaly, are in english:
https://philpapers.org/archive/HUEDOE.pdf
https://philpapers.org/archive/HUEDOE-2.pdf
https://philpapers.org/archive/HUEDOE-3.pdf
https://philpapers.org/archive/HUEDOE-4.pdf
Takes the form of a conversation between two people, like the texts of olde.