|
|
|
|
|
|
by codedokode
343 days ago
|
|
|
> However, OpenAI has publicly acknowledged ongoing investigations as to whether DeepSeek “inappropriately distilled” their models to produce an AI chatbot at a fraction of the price. I wonder does OpenAI has permission from all authors of works it "inappropriately distilled"? A pirate has no right to complain about safety of navigation. I think there should be a system that if country A illegally uses works of country B for developing an AI, it loses copyright protection in country B. |
|
|
The rulings are leaning towards it being transformative enough to be fair use, so permission may not be required [1]. We'll have to see how it goes with Disney vs Midjourney.
> I think there should be a system that if country A illegally uses works of country B for developing an AI, it loses copyright protection in country B.
This would be pointless with China, since it's already how they operate, as continuously reported by the WTO.
But, I see your point.
[1] https://www.whitecase.com/insight-alert/two-california-distr...