|
|
|
|
|
by ICBTheory
331 days ago
|
|
3. On “He redefines AGI to make his result inevitable” Sure. I redefined AGI. By using…
…the definition from OpenAI, DeepMind, Anthropic, IBM, Goertzel, and Hutter. So unless those are now fringe newsletters, the definition stands: - A general-purpose system that autonomously solves a wide range of human-level problems, with competence equivalent to or greater than human performance - If that’s the target, the contradiction is structural: No symbolic system can operate stably in the kinds of semantic drift, ambiguity, or frame collapse that general intelligence actually requires.
So if you think I smuggled in a trap, check your own luggage because the industry packed it for me. |
|