[anigbrowl]

So what? You're just deflecting attention from this story to a poorly researched one written by someone else. That's like me saying people should ignore anything you say because some other lawyer used ChatGPT in court. Do better.

[rayiner]

OP explained why this article displayed a bit of economic ignorance, insofar as the framing is confused about what’s the real story. I’m simply providing broader context.

That is, if I start hallucinating citations it’s fair to compare me to AI!

[anigbrowl]

Well that's some bullshit, from beginning to end.