|
|
|
|
|
|
by hooah
348 days ago
|
|
|
He’s been saying that LLM isn’t a “universal solvent”, not as a “recent claim”. '''
In my 2018 Deep Learning: A Critical Appraisal for example, I wrote Despite all of the problems I have sketched, I don’t think that we need to abandon deep learning. Rather, we need to reconceptualize it: not as a universal solvent, but simply as one tool among many, a power screwdriver in a world in which we also need hammers, wrenches, and pliers, not to mentions chisels and drills, voltmeters, logic probes, and oscilloscopes.
''' |
|
|