[iainctduncan]

I personally do not use LLMs (knowingly) at all, largely for environmental reasons. The improvements are, to me, not worth the attrocious energy use. I will happily pay 20% or whatever more in both money and time.

I also have no interest in technology that impedes my skill development. I do not want to use anything that makes me a worse writer over time.

YMMV, I am answering the OP not evangelizing. Counter arguments will be ignored.

[harvey9]

You don't owe anyone a back and forth discussion anyway, so the last line comes off as redundant.

[iainctduncan]

You are, of course, right. But my experience with comments in response to environmental impacts of LLMs here has been so negative that it feels appropriate nonetheless.

[dosco189]

What do you mean by energy here? Personal energy (i.e. time, effort, up-skilling etc) or energy as a physics concept (i.e. literal energy usage in watts, the production of which will harm the environment)?

[throwaway3b03]

> YMMV, I am answering the OP not evangelizing. Counter arguments will be ignored.

Reminds me of the Monty Python Arguing sketch.

[Neywiny]

No it doesn't