[albedoa]

> it's not in fact the norm for any discussion about code here to include links to the code.

I certainly didn't interpret "these types of posts" to mean "any discussion about code", and I highly doubt anyone else did.

The top-level comment is making a significant claim, not a casual remark about code they produced. We should expect it to be presented with substantiating artifacts.

[tptacek]

I guess. I kind of side-eyed the original one-shotting claim, not because I don't believe it, but because I don't believe it matters. Serious LLM-driven code generation runs in an iterative process. I'm not sure why first-output quality matters that much; I care about the outcome, not the intermediate steps.

So if we're looking for stories about LLMs one-shotting high-quality code, accompanied by the generated code, I'm less sure of where those examples would be!