|
|
|
|
|
by narush
337 days ago
|
|
Honestly, this is a fair point -- and speaks the difficulty of figuring out the right baseline to measure against here! If we studied folks with _no_ AI experience, then we might underestimate speedup, as these folks are learning tools (see a discussion of learning effects in section (C.2.7) - Below-average use of AI tools - in the paper). If we studied folks with _only_ AI experience, then we might overestimate speedup, as perhaps these folks can't really program without AI at all. In some sense, these are just two separate and interesting questions - I'm excited for future work to really dig in on both! |
|
Wouldn't this be an underestimate, since without ai there'd be no forward progress at all? So ai-assisted is infinite speedup if the outputs are good.