|
|
|
|
|
|
by matt_trentini
344 days ago
|
|
|
Speed: maybe, sometimes. Of course, MicroPython makes it very easy to create modules written in C, accessible from MicroPython. So if you need extra perf you can always write a smattering of C. Reliability: I don't see why Toit would be any better? FWIW we make medical devices using MicroPython and have tests that have run for many months with no failures. MicroPython, the language, is extremely reliable and thoroughly tested [1], though admittedly the port-specific code can be less so. We've evaluated Toit and it has some nice features (the containerization is novel and powerful!)...but it's a quirky language with sparse peripheral support. Ultimately it's trivial for Python-familiar developers to switch across to MicroPython - a big benefit. Being constrained to the ESP32 is a limitation that many of our customers would not allow. [1] See the py folder: https://micropython.org/resources/code-coverage/ |
|
|