|
|
|
|
|
by weird-eye-issue
339 days ago
|
|
Great so your experiment just consisted of having an LLM hallucinate That's not really an experiment is it? You basically just used them to create a hypothesis but you never actually proved anything They're great at writing text and code so the fact that the other LLM was able to use that syntax to presumably write code that worked (which you had no way of proving since you can't actually run that code) doesn't really mean anything It would be similar to having it respond in a certain JSON format, they are great at that too. Doesn't really translate to a real world codebase |
|
This isn't a published study, it was an experiment. And it influenced how I use LLMs for work, for the better. I'd even call that a successful experiment, now that I better understand the strengths and limitations of LLMs in this field.