|
|
|
|
|
by troupo
345 days ago
|
|
> There's no point in idempotency for operations that change the state. Of course there is > DELETE is supposed to be idempotent, but it can only be if you limit yourself to deletion by unique, non-repeating id Which is most operations > Should you do something like delete by email or product, you have to use another operation, Erm.... No, you don't? > which then obviously will be POST anyway. And there's no way to "cache" a delete operation. Why would you want to cache a delete operation? |
|