[korgy]

This is pretty clever. I can definitely see the appeal for writers with big archives that readers don’t have time to sift through. I’m wondering though — does it handle more conversational queries well, or is it better for straightforward factual lookups?

[sahilkat]

It actually works well for conversational queries too. As long as the topic has been covered in the newsletters, it can handle both casual and direct questions. The responses are designed to reflect the author's own style, but it always sticks to what’s in the newsletters—so to avoid hallucination.