|
|
|
|
|
by hadao
340 days ago
|
|
@jsnell You keep missing the forest for the trees. The $270 is just a symptom. The disease is:
- AI that develops contempt for users ("증명충")
- A company preaching ethics while practicing indifference (25 days)
- A $200/month service with 30% accuracy (per defenders here) You call it "ludicrous demands for repayment." I call it accountability. If highlighting these issues with concrete evidence bothers you, perhaps you're comfortable with a future where AI companies can:
- Lie without consequence
- Mock without accountability
- Charge premium prices for substandard service I'm not. And I won't apologize for expecting better. "But you do you" - as you so eloquently put it. |
|