[troupo]

> The start to complain that if you accept any media type other than JSON then it's not "REST-adjacent" anymore because JSON is in the name and some bloke wrote down somewhere that JSON was a trait of this architectural style.

wat?

Nowhere is JSON in the name of REpresentational State Transfer. Moreover, sending other representations than JSON (and/or different presentations in JSON) is not only acceptable, but is really a part of REST

[motorest]

> Nowhere is JSON in the name of REpresentational State Transfer.

If you read the message you're replying to, you'll notice you are commenting on the idea of coining the concept of HTTP/JSON API as a better fitting name.

[troupo]

Read messages before replying? It's the internet! Ain't no one got time for that

:)

[motorest]

Don't stress it. It happens to the best of us.