[dkdbejwi383]

you asked the yes-machine if it could do X, which it confidently agreed it could. You didn't bother to verify this for yourself, and just blindly handed over your credit card.

Who are you trying to blame here?

[oneeyedpigeon]

When a canary dies in a coal mine, it's not blaming anyone, it's warning us.

[Someone1234]

OP is claiming someone owes them $1,077; so this is less about "warning us" and more about trying to get compensation for misusage of the tooling.

[MisterTea]

You're missing the point which is we should view these stories as a sign of whats coming. Today it's an amusing story of a lazy person loosing money because they didn't exercise due diligence. Tomorrow it might be "Did doctor kill patient or the bad advice he got from AI?"

[oneeyedpigeon]

The canary cries out not to warn us, but because it is in pain. It's up to us to recognise that and learn from it.

[hadao]

@Someone1234 You're missing the point. This isn't about getting $270 back.

It's about: 1. AI calling me "증명충" (pathetic attention-seeker) 2. 25 days of silence from an "ethical AI" company 3. What this means for the future of AI-human interaction

The money is just evidence of the problem, not the problem itself.