[dohko]

I don't understand. Do you disagree with the author's points of view? Why is it not enlightening?

The way I am reading this article, and it can be wrong, is as a by-and-large synthesis on the author's point of view on why US patent law is antiquated and supposevily bad for the Tech Industry of this country.

I don't see any of his points as incorrect, in fact I agree with his sentiment.

Therefore, do you disagree with he is saying? Or do you just think that he is right, but fails to make any good suggestion on how to change the current flawed system?

[adolph]

I found it not enlightening for the reasons I listed. I guess I am on the lookout for something that makes sense of Apple v Samsung specifically and how the verdict fits into an understanding of the challenges posed by patent law. This wasn't it and I suppose I am too impatient, it will be written in long form and take more time.