|
|
|
|
|
by nomaxx117
342 days ago
|
|
I wonder how much putting a CDN in front of this would reduce this. According to the readme, it seems like the bulk
of the traffic is highly cacheable, so presumably you could park something a CDN in front and substantially reduce the bandwidth requirements. |
|
That is one of the primary motivations of its design over the previous CT API, which had some relatively flexible requests that led to less good caching.