[louthy]

> They're knowingly contributing to abuse of the discovery process to violate privacy

Are they? Are you speculating or do you know something we don’t?

It seems that if the NYT want to know whether ChatGPT has been producing copyrighted material, that they own, verbatim, and also understand the scale of the abuse, then they would need to see the logs.

People shouldn’t be surprised, that a company that flouts the law (regardless of what they think of those laws) for its own financial gain, might end up with its collected data in a legal discovery. It’s evidence.