|
|
|
|
|
by freejazz
354 days ago
|
|
What sort of things do you think people do that it is often the case that there is a genuine question of whether or not the use was fair? >You have to do it in order to get into court and find out of you're allowed to do it (a ridiculous prerequisite to begin with), and then if it goes against you, you have to pay punitive damages? Nobody made you undertake the questionable fair use. If you're gonna fease, you better not malfease. |
|
Every time some new technology or other change happens, things become possible that didn't used to be and then nobody knows what the law is going to be until a judge decides the case.
> Nobody made you undertake the questionable fair use. If you're gonna fease, you better not malfease.
But how are you supposed to know that before you get sued? If it's something you are allowed to do, but you don't know that yet for sure, what do you do to find out?