|
|
|
|
|
by GianFabien
345 days ago
|
|
>letting the AI just generate it while I prompt But isn't prompting and iterating another way of instructing the computer to do what you want? Perhaps we could view it as a step up in the level of abstraction we work at. We had similar arguments when high-level languages were introduced. Experienced programmers of that era maintained that they could write better programs in assembly language than in COBOL/FORTRAN/PL-I/Pascal etc. Yet even today we still need core portions of code written in assembler, but not much. |
|
We are operating at the same level of abstraction, just with tools to generate high volumes of inconsistent quality of it for us
Edit: It would have to produce a lot higher quality a lot more consistently for me to seriously consider moving up to the "LLM prompt" abstraction layer permanently. As it is I think I'm just better off writing the code myself