[cryptonector]

Yes, I know, credentialism means you must immediately ignore anything he has to say. Yet he writes papers on climate science, especially on the effects of volcanic eruptions, and he does a better job of archiving code and data (and documenting how he sources the data) than most. Maybe you should try reading what I linked.

[lucyjojo]

what are you seeing in this article? to me it looks like bog standard conspiracy drivel...

[cryptonector]

The article I linked says that the _paper_ that TFA refers to[0] says nothing about a reversal of the current, only a reversal of the freshening of surface water on the polar southern ocean. Is that not indeed a correct reading of the underlying paper? That's a simple yes or no question. See for yourself[0]!

[0] https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2500440122