|
|
|
|
|
by hwillis
339 days ago
|
|
You're massively misrepresenting what I'm saying. I am not dismissing nuclear or suggesting overbuilding solar by 5x. I am responding to someone who is dismissing solar now for the fantastical idea that nuclear is cheaper now. Nuclear is good. Nuclear should replace coal. Shutting down reactors that are not unsafe is ridiculous. We should build breeder reactors. Personally I think even many countries that have reactors should build more, and retrofit existing reactors to have much higher ramp rates a la French nuclear. Countries with no nuclear or hydro or geo base like Poland should definitely build nuclear plants. But many countries have large amounts of nuclear- many enough to supply most nighttime power. And in almost all countries, solar is by far the best and cheapest immediate option, and those countries should be building as much solar as possible until the marginal return of nuclear or storage or infrastructure for imports are cheaper than just building more and more solar. > I am not aware of any large scale operating exports of solar energy from equatorial regions to Northern Europe, or similar distance. No country is even close to a solar oversupply, much less a 2x or 5x. If there is no margin, why would those projects exist? |
|