[kordlessagain]

ARC is definitely about achieving AGI and it doesn't matter whether we "have" it or not right now. That is the goal:

> where he introduced the "Abstract and Reasoning Corpus for Artificial General Intelligence" (ARC-AGI) benchmark to measure intelligence

So, a high enough score is a threshold to claim AGI. And, if you use an LLM to work these types of problems, it becomes pretty clear that passing more tests indicates a level of "awareness" that goes beyond rational algorithms.

I thought I had seen everything until I started working on some of the problems with agents. I'm still sorta in awe about how the reasoning manifests. (And don't get me wrong, LLMs like Claude still go completely off the rails where even a less intelligent human would know better.)

[MPSimmons]

>a high enough score is a threshold to claim AGI

I'm pretty sure he said that AGI would achieve a high score, not that a high score was indicative of AGI