[adastra22]

They, and the other posters posting similar things, don't mean human-like intelligence, or even the rigorously defined solving of unconstrained problem spaces that originally defined Artificial General Intelligence (in contrast to "narrow" intelligence").

They mean an artificial god, and it has become a god of the gaps: we have made artificial general intelligence, and it is more human-like than god-like, and so to make a god we must have it do XYZ precisely because that is something which people can't do.

[ummonk]

Right, but there is a very clear term for that which they should be using: ASI

[adastra22]

Agree, and you shouldn't be downvoted. It is a pet peeve of me as well.