Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by bryanlarsen 343 days ago
Overbuilding is significantly cheaper than either months worth of storage or intercontinental HVDC electrical links. It's probably worth building links with Romania, but probably not equatorial North Africa. Instead if you want to hit 100% carbon free, overbuild solar to almost your 5X, mix in a good amount of wind, a couple days of storage and links with Romania or nearby.

IMO 99% is a much better target than 100%: almost all of the benefits for a lot less cost. Idle natural gas plants don't emit carbon.

(And by 100% I mean 99.99%. The grid isn't reliable enough to make more than 99.99% worth the cost).

1 comments

An ideal side effect of over overbuilding solar 5x for winter is that you could then use that spare solar in the other 3 seasons to make green hydrogen, an energy intensive process, to power retrofitted gas plants. You could store and ship excess gas as well, creating an adhoc "green energy interconnect" with other nations.
IMO the best use for excess summer solar for winter use is directly storing heat in a heat energy storage system (HESS, a fancy word for a bunch of sand/rock wrapped in a meter or two of insulation). Dump in the heat through resistive heating, use the heat directly for heating in winter. Batteries are expensive, but thermal mass is literally dirt cheap and scales up expoentially well thanks to the cube-square law. Just store and use the heat directly!