[whiplash451]

You're not the only one. ARC-AGI is a laudable effort, but its fundamental premise is indeed debatable:

"We argue that human cognition follows strictly the same pattern as human physical capabilities: both emerged as evolutionary solutions to specific problems in specific evironments" (from page 22 of On the Measure of Intelligence)

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1911.01547

[Davidzheng]

But I believe that because of this "even edge" thing which people call of AI weakenesses being not necessarily same of humans, once we run out of these tests which AI is worse than humans it will actually in effect be very much superhuman. My main evidence for this is leela-zero the Go AI who struggled with ladders and some other aspects of Go play well into the superhuman regime (in go it's easier to see when it's superhuman bc you can have elos and play win-rates etc and there's less room for debates)