[degun]

The explanation you gave is already contained in the cited Wikipedia article. I think this "ghoti" example is more of a tongue-in-cheek mocking of pronunciation inconsistencies. If you want a jarring example, consider laughter and slaughter. I know, i know, they have different origins, but still, it confuses foreigners like me while learning the language.

[mousethatroared]

But English orthography isn't meant to serve foreigners.

Im ESL, I struggled with English spelling as much as the next latin speaker who's already learned to read and write in foreigner.

But now that I get the reason behind it, I love it. I consider English orthography worthy of UNESCO protection, even. In fact, I am annoyed at the regular spelling of my two latin languages that have left so much history behind.

[akst]

English Orthography doesn't exactly serve native speakers either.

[devilbunny]

It’s fairly good at helping us understand the etymology. Have a “y” acting as a vowel in the spelling? Good chance it’s Greek. Have a “k”? Almost certainly not Latin.

[bluGill]

That is trivia that is useless in almost all contexts. I've been a native English speaker all my life and this is the first I've heard of that. I can't think of any situation in life where knowing that fact would have been helpful. Your claim seems reasonable, but if someone says you are wrong I wouldn't fact check it even if clear links were posted so that I could.

[devilbunny]

If you’re seeing a word for the first time, it is pretty useful - partly with pronunciation but definitely with meaning.

You do have to have some familiarity with the source languages, but if it’s an unfamiliar but nativized word, those are almost always ultimately Latin or Greek.

[int_19h]

If you're seeing the word for the first time and need to figure out how to pronounce it, how would you know that “y” is acting as a vowel and not as a consonant in the first place?

[mousethatroared]

Im a materials scientist and I use etymology every day.

Knowing etymology is a an easy way to memorize things.

[throaway955]

But if you had known it (aka, if anyone had taught it to you), it wouldn't be useless, as you would know the context and how to pronounce it...not to mention the meaning behind it

[akst]

For sure, but I'm not sure this the primary purpose of a writing system.

By all means a fun aspect about English that you can look at a word and guess the origin, and it's pretty satisfying to pull it up on google to see your high because you looked at spelling. This novelty has come at the expense of many other things that would have increased its utility.

I guess I'll add one thing to list benefits, this probably has resulted in different dialects of English writing things the same way despite saying them differently. Singaporean English is very different from Scottish English, but the written form of the same statements for the most part decipherable by the other dialect.

[hyperpape]

> But English orthography isn't meant to serve foreigners.

Or natives. It is slower for children to learn to read English than other languages.

[jgwil2]

Teaching my toddler to read now and I definitely feel like if we spoke Spanish my work would be done already.

[bluGill]

Probably not. Toddlers generally don't have the brain to learn any reading. Spanish's advantages in reading isn't how young you can start learning to read, it is how fast you can stop reading. Spanish schools stop teaching reading takes about 5 years to learn, English 6, and Japanese 9 - after that much training kids are finally considered to read anything. (sometimes we talk about college level reading, but that is more about mastery of topic specific topic - Doctors, lawyers, and engineers each have special vocabulary that needs extra training to read, but they cannot read each other's technical papers)

[mousethatroared]

I learned how to read in six months.

My kid took two and half years.

The Chinese take 10 years.

So what? Are the Chinese terribly educated?