|
|
|
|
|
by ttoinou
341 days ago
|
|
The author seems to be a great educator and computer scientist, much respect to his work. But from what I can gather, although I'd love to study more infinite sized matrices, he proved / showed nothing in this article. What he wrote is not true at all, they are only analogies and not rigorous maths. Functions are not vectors. But finite polynomials are vectors yes, this is trivial. |
|
It's not a particularly interesting proof, but the author does prove that real valued functions are vectors. The bulk of the article is less about proofs, and more about showing how the above result is useful.