|
|
|
|
|
by strogonoff
343 days ago
|
|
I imagined that at some point someone would come up with the idea “let’s remove more noise to compress things better and then add it back on the client”. Turns out, it is Netflix (I mean, who else wins so much from saving bandwidth). Personally I rejected the idea after thinking about it for a couple of minutes, and I’m not yet sure I was wrong. The challenge with noise is that it is actually cannot be perfectly automatically distinguished and removed from what could be finer details and textures even in a still photo, not to mention high-resolution footage. If removing noise was as simple as that, digital photography would be completely different. If you have removed noise, you can’t just add back missing detail later—if you could, you would not have removed it in the first place (alas, no algorithm is good enough, and even human eye can be faulty). |
|
I'm saying that the final result is better than standard compression at the same bitrate.