> Netherlands-based Elsevier bans the use of such tools, citing the "risk that the technology will generate incorrect, incomplete or biased conclusions."
That's for peer reviewers, who aren't paid. Elsevier is also reported to be using AI to replace editing staff. Perhaps this risk is less relevant when there is an opportunity to increase profits?
Elsevier is trash for so many reasons that I'm amazed they're still in business. I'm glad educational facilities are moving more and more to open-access publications at the very least.