| Let me clarify that I dont think any of what I described is a given. I think its one of the more likely outcomes of our future. I think its prudent to own a small amount of Bitcoin (or basket of cryptocurrencies) in order to hedge against that future or someting close to it. > What about the other thousands of other public blockchains, many of which are extremely similar (DOGE, BCH, LTC, ...)? They are simply not as secure and could be attacked by well funded actors. Perhaps in time another blockchain will win out. >... Metaverse anytime now. Just curious. Do we disagree about where this (technological progress) is headed, or is it the timeline? I think its quite likely that we will spend more and more time in vitual or augmented reality. For good or ill. > Personally, I think there is much more value in trusted systems. I prefer the absence of a central authority. Perhaps im cynical. > ... because the world didn't work at all prior to 2009? We dont need crypto right now either. I simply think that the only good outcome of our digital future is a trustless one, and I think blockchain will play a central role there. > Solutions to this problem might well involve digital signatures and hardware enclaves in cameras (installed by trusted centralized camera producers which could publish the public keys of each sold camera once), but I don't see how public blockchains would add any value. The signature of the picture embedded in the picture speaks for itself. The value of blockchain is in the absence of a trusted centralized camera producer that can be pressured. > Apart from the fact that I don't see the benefit of that, the oracle problem makes this impossible, I fear. The oracle problem is solved in the same way the camera problem is solved. By digital signatures of real world interactions of the machines in the production chain. I think the world will lean into trustless systems over trusted systems, lets see. That is not to say that I dont think the world would continue to function on trusted systems, I just think it makes dystopian outcomes more likely. |