|
|
|
|
|
by dottedmag
350 days ago
|
|
It is, but directly, not as a subversion. I have had a similar experience with a team member who was quietly unhappy about a rule. Instead of raising a discussion about the rule (like the rest of the team members did) he tried to quietly ignore it in his work, usually via requesting reviews from less stringent reviewers. As a result, after a while I started documenting every single instance of his sneaky rule-breakage, sending every instance straight to his manager, and the person was out pretty soon. |
|
It is directly challenged in the very thread linked in the article (and likely before, the drama is ancient).
Also, there is no "less stringent reviewer", it's always been the same you!
So your example fails at both core points, yet your outcome is still the same happy firing!
At least for paid work you can just sprinkle $ to cover up such mistakes and find someone else, but wait, this is also not paid work!