[skydhash]

Criticism is not refutation. It's identifying flaws (subjectively or objectively) . I'm all for it if you can show me that those flaws don't exist or are inconsequential.

Workflows are personal and the only one who can judge them are the one who is paying for the work. At most, we can compare them in order to improve our own personal workflow.

My feedback is maybe not clear enough. But here are the main points:

- Too complicated in regards to the example provided, with the actual benefits for the complication not explained.

- Not a great methodology because the answer to the queries are tainted by the query. Like testing for alcohol by putting the liquid in a bottle of vodka. When I search for something that is not there, I expect "no results" or an error message. Not a mirage.

- The process of getting information, making decisions, and then acting is corrupted by putting it only at some irrelevant moments: Before even knowing anything; When presented with a restricted list of options with no understanding of the factors that play in the restriction; and after the work is done.