[imtringued]

This blog post was served an opportunity on a silver platter to explain what's wrong with the responding tweet and instead contains a highly irrelevant analogy.

Original Post: VCs respond if you say AI. VCS don't respond at all if you don't mention AI

Response: You should be happy that they only respond to AI and not respond if you don't have AI

OP calls the game rigged, but the response calls the game fair. That's where the contradiction lies.

[actuallyalys]

I’m personally doubtful that venture capital is a socially beneficial or fair process [0], but I’m inclined to agree with the author of the post that the “experiment” isn’t a good basis for that conversation.

[0]: Yes, I realize the irony of posting that here.

[Doxin]

The blog isn't about the responding tweet. Or even about any tweets. It's just using them as examples of a communication pattern the author noticed.

[taylorlunt]

I have personally no interest in the actual debate the two were engaged in.