Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by p_ing 345 days ago
> Case in point: the concept of a service plan. It's straight up stupid to have a so-called cloud provider force customers to manage how many instances packing X RAM and Y vCPUs you need to have to run a function-as-a-service app, and then have to manage how that is shared with app services and other function apps.

You're not forced to, you can use a consumption plan.

https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/functions/...

1 comments

> You're not forced to, you can use a consumption plan.

Pray tell, what do you think is relevant in citing how many plans you can pick and choose from to just run a simple function? I mean, are you trying to argue that instead of one type of plan, you have to choose another type of plan?

The consumption plan is the default plan, so technically you don't have to choose anything, just go with the defaults.

But it disproves your point that you're "forced" to have an app service plan.

At this point you're simply arguing to argue after having been shown to be incorrect multiple times. Good luck.